Free Essays on The First World War

â€Å"Some nations were more to blame than others† The legendary and unforgettable 20th century, an epoch of scientific discoveries, a brand new, flawlessly modern, at the same time secretly mystifying, but none the less attractive and remarkable world. Numerous developments, industrial improvements and technical growth, as well as political progression had made it a period of great changes, both socially and politically, resulting in the horrible, however colossal First World War. Before 1914, the world was merely a community, resembling a battlefield, it had not yet put all the latest hi-tech machinery, of the time, into practice. A front line, which was fought by independent countries in self-sufficient ways, where your neighbour would rarely be involved and the land you fought for was the main objective, became the conflict between many nations, for everyone was in a wild race for power and foreign territories. Due to such intentions, the tension and differences of the various world communities began to evolve. Europe, being the centre of much scientific, artistic and industrial advancement, hosting numerous empires, extremely dominant and able, was gradually building up its fights, clashes and arguments over small, simple issues, which would turn into greater ones reasonably soon. Germany, a nation of strength and remarkable pride, had taken the lead in industry, over Britain. Austria-Hungary, a multicultural environment, containing nations with those who wanted self-government and liberty, was losing its once so firm and respectably well-built supremacy over countries, such as Serbia. Britain, an independent tough and incredibly capable remote island, which wanted equal power for everyone, however remained happy as long as it was a little bit more advanced than anyone else would ever be. A dream come true, however not for long, as the rapid growth of Germany had promptly taken over her marvels. France, a plentiful and s... Free Essays on The First World War Free Essays on The First World War â€Å"Some nations were more to blame than others† The legendary and unforgettable 20th century, an epoch of scientific discoveries, a brand new, flawlessly modern, at the same time secretly mystifying, but none the less attractive and remarkable world. Numerous developments, industrial improvements and technical growth, as well as political progression had made it a period of great changes, both socially and politically, resulting in the horrible, however colossal First World War. Before 1914, the world was merely a community, resembling a battlefield, it had not yet put all the latest hi-tech machinery, of the time, into practice. A front line, which was fought by independent countries in self-sufficient ways, where your neighbour would rarely be involved and the land you fought for was the main objective, became the conflict between many nations, for everyone was in a wild race for power and foreign territories. Due to such intentions, the tension and differences of the various world communities began to evolve. Europe, being the centre of much scientific, artistic and industrial advancement, hosting numerous empires, extremely dominant and able, was gradually building up its fights, clashes and arguments over small, simple issues, which would turn into greater ones reasonably soon. Germany, a nation of strength and remarkable pride, had taken the lead in industry, over Britain. Austria-Hungary, a multicultural environment, containing nations with those who wanted self-government and liberty, was losing its once so firm and respectably well-built supremacy over countries, such as Serbia. Britain, an independent tough and incredibly capable remote island, which wanted equal power for everyone, however remained happy as long as it was a little bit more advanced than anyone else would ever be. A dream come true, however not for long, as the rapid growth of Germany had promptly taken over her marvels. France, a plentiful and s...

Insect Essays

Insect Essays Insect Essay Insect Essay Plants use allelopathy to assure them a spot in nature. I am trying to see which one of these plants inhibits the germination of radish seeds the most. Putnam (1984) reported that eucalyptus species released volatile compounds such as benzoic, cinnamic and phenolic acids, which inhibit growth of crops and weeds growing near it. Eucalyptus is a widely well-known allelopathic plant. I believe that Eucalyptus will allow the least amount of germination of radish seeds between Eucalyptus, Lemon, and a control. Allelopathy Lab Read Lab 8 in the Lab Manual This lab will require some setting up using household materials. You can be creative by using substitute materials if you dont have the exact list of materials handy. Please photograph your results and use that as part of your report. The seeds to use can be radish seeds or mung bean seeds, both of which germinate rapidly. Mung bean seeds can often be found in health food stores for they are grown by many to uses as bean sprouts in salads. Other seeds can be used but may take longer or rot. YOU ONLY NEED TO TEST ONE ALLELOPATHIC PLANT OF YOUR CHOICE. It can differ from those listed in the lab manual, since there are many more

The Impact of Advertisement on Children Research Paper

The Impact of Advertisement on Children - Research Paper Example This essay "The Impact of Advertisement on Children" describes the negative effects of TV advertisement on children health and behavioral patterns as well as the family economy. According to the recent research children are most influenced by food promotion. Moreover, food companies have the most powerful advertising campaigns. One of the major negative impacts of advertising on children is eating habits change due to numerous junk food commercials (Quereshi et al., 2). Most companies advertise food with increased amount of fats, calories, and salt. Numerous sugared drinks, unhealthy snacks, chips, and sweets are promoted products on TV and the Internet. Even cereals which are advertised as useful have increased amount of sugar (Quereshi et al., 2). Kids who are influenced by TV commercials have wrong perception of healthy portion sizes because people on the screen often eat enormous portions. That is why children who watch TV advertisements regularly have distorted eating habits. Te enagers are also affected by TV commercials, although they know the difference between healthy and unhealthy food they usually choose products that are more desirable. It is problematic that eating habits formed in early childhood most likely to remain for the rest of life. Nevertheless, family eating patterns and dietary preferences are estimated to have more influence on children that TV commercials (Quereshi et al., 4). TV is proved to be connected to increase of obesity and overweight in children.

Word history Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Word history - Assignment Example This paper discusses fashion changes during the World War Two. In 1940, the general style that women adopted looked like U.S military uniforms in a big way. The color and the cut of the clothes they wore on the home front always resembled what soldiers wore while fighting in the Pacific and European theaters. The blouses and jackets they wore were more masculine and militarized with shoulder pads. The hats similarly resembled U.S Army berets (Wolfe web). During war time, women took up more labor-intensive works like flying military aircraft, working in shipyards, and driving truck. These works highly influenced how they wore as safety and practicality would take over their glamour and femininity. The popularity of â€Å"Rosie the Riveter† meant that headscarf and slacks would become more stylish. The working class women dressed in silk pants for khaki jackets and blue jeans and high-heeled shoes. They also wore wraparound dresses with less adornments and their hair was pinned back to avoid it from getting caught by machineries (Monet web). With time, women’s clothing had to go with the rationing of certain materials used for military purposes. Silk and wool were in high demand for parachutes and uniforms, therefore, most civilians had to wear clothes made from rayon instead. To ensure that fabric was conserved, the manufacturers and dress makers started designing slimmer silhouettes and shorter skirts. Nylon would be available for civilian use only. Stockings disappeared shortly and women went barelegged. Within a period of four years, many women had joined workforce (Monet web). They demonstrated a lot of good skills, determination and patriotism and this undeniably impacted the fashion world. The people of Chavin first established the dominant civilization from 900 BCE and 200 BCE while Olmec’s people established the civilization in the centuries before 1200 BCE and declined around 400

Violence on Television Essay Example for Free

Violence on Television Essay Used mostly in promotional purposes, television shows that contain violence to any degree have become so rampant. Though there are some provisions that somehow restrict or limit the air time when they are shown and also the extent to which violent acts are shown. I think, still, there must be one good move to be taken into consideration. I think this movement should abide by this statement: The amount of violence on television must be reduced and the airing time of the TV shows that contain violence must only be during the time when children are in bed, or they can even be banned when the violence is too offensive. As I said, violence acts are mostly for promotions. Since viewers were stimulated as their adrenalin rushed when suspense happen during shooting of guns or murder cases, this is also the time when promotions pops out, thus enabling viewers to see the promotion (www. ridgenet. org/ 20href=). If this is the case, why can they search for another opportunity when they can advertise their business? Other genre of shows like comedy that contains no act of violence also excites viewers, thus these kinds can serve as an opportunity. Promotions are not that big as the next problem I will present regarding the showing of TV shows with violent acts. Adults have greater experience, obviously, that’s why they can understand that violent acts on TV are just for the sake of entertainment. For them, it is just another thing in TV that can somehow entertain and in some case educate them; but children are not like them. According to psychologists, children in toddler stage are instinctively wants to imitate adult human behavior and that they are not geared up with the knowledge of choosing which should be imitated or not. Thus exposing them to these acts may cause them to imitate violent acts which are obviously not proper. In a survey made in America by a group of psychologists, children of ages 2 to 5 are watching television for an average of almost 30 hours. Also, based on studies, children up to four years of age cannot recognize which is factual from fantasy without adult intervention. This may cause them to believe that what they see is true (Centerwall). Aside from imitation, there are many other psychological effects for children of seeing violence on television. Children who watch violence are most likely to be aggressive and behave the same way as what he saw. That is, he will become more and more violent if he sees more and more violence. Also, their views about the world may change. They may think that the world we’re living is dangerous and that to survive, they are meant to be aggressive. They may also become insensitive to other for they saw that it is so natural for some person to be hit or killed or be hurt by others. They are also the type that would react slowly during emergency. What’s so alarming is that these behaviors can be carried through teenage years and even in adulthood. According to Dr. Leonard Eron of the University of Illinois, children exposed to violence become aggressive when they are teenagers and be more likely to be arrested when they become adult (Centerwall). These made me come up with the conclusion of limiting the airing time to the time when children are in bed, which is about before 5am to after 10 pm. What is missing about my argument is the role of parents about this matter. Truly, it is their responsibility to guide their children while watching; but we cannot always count on them for they have also their own responsibilities. They are busy with home chores or they go to work that they had no enough time to ensure that their children are watching what should be watched. Let us not deny the fact that most children can freely open the television and watch even if their parents are not there and sometimes parents use television as baby sitters. Let us also take not that even funny cartoons contain violence so let us also be aware of them. According to one survey made by a TV station on parents, almost 70% parents believe that there is too much amount of violent acts that are shown in TV. Forty percent of the total respondents believe that these acts are not good for their children (Blue Oceans Psychology). That’s why, the amount of the violence in TV shows must be reduced. To take a big step about this problem, it is better to define the responsibilities of the bodies that are concern with the matter. Let’s look at the TV manufacturers. The law now makes a move of pushing manufacturers to enable a blocking system in every unit. This will prevent children from free access of shows unless their parents will allow them; but this will need some increase of awareness since parents are not that expert in which to watch or not. This will lead us to the TV ratings board which judge TV shows whether they are suitable to an age bracket or not. I also just like them to have the authority of banning programs where violence shown is too offensive. And lastly, the parents, themselves, are one of the key role players in this matter. Their guidance still is the best factor in shaping the character of their children. Today, there are still debates on between TV operators and those that push against violence on TV. Though research results are presented, we cannot easily say that TV is doing wrong since its business for them. Right now, all of us must be aware and be observant so that every detail of this problem must be taken into account.

A TV Show that is Appropiate for a Younger Audience :: Free Essay Writer

A TV Show that is Appropiate for a Younger Audience Wishbone: A Little Dog with a Big Imagination â€Å"Printed Paws of Thieves" With his uncanny knowledge of famous authors, a little dog-named Wishbone is one very smart canine. The Wishbone television series has been created to introduce children to classic literature and encourage a love for reading books. The half-hour, live-action series, designed primarily for elementary school children between the ages of 6 and 12, represents an entirely new concept in educational programming. As children watch Wishbone the dog’s adventure in the world of literature, they will come away with their first taste of classic literature as well as a desire to learn more. The series stars Wishbone the dog, â€Å"a little dog with a big imagination,† who serves as a canine bridge between life and literature. Portrayed in the series by a real Jack Russell terrier, Wishbone the dog represents an articulate, clever and funny character, whose every thought, is heard by the audience. Each episode presents a different literary classic, introduced through Wishbone the dog’s active imagination and fantasies. For example in the episode â€Å"Printed Paws of Thieves† which presents the story of Robin Hood, Joe Talbot the 12-year old owner of Wishbone almost gets suspended when he helps the school lunch lady donate leftover food to a local shelter. Meanwhile, Wishbone as Robin Hood risks arrest when he robs from the rich to give to the poor. In this episode, Wishbone is wearing the typical outfit we think of Robin Hood wearing a Brown leather two-piece outfit carrying a bow and arrow and a feathered cap. Wishbone portrays the character, Robin Hood as if how we would perceive him in the classic literature story. Throughout this episode Wishbone and the other characters, Joe Talbot, David (Joe’s best friend), and Samantha (a neighborhood friend of Joe’s and David’s), reinforce the primary literary themes explored in â€Å"Robin Hood.à ¢â‚¬  Wishbone the dog represents the imaginative, playful child inside all of us. Through his wild adventures and heroic stunts, children will be introduced to some of the greatest literary works of literature. This PBS series provides a challenge for children to read, by providing signature scenes, the basic characters, and themes from classic literature without presenting the entire story so children will want to learn more about the story. It provides a foundation for the children to apply what they already know about the story from the Wishbone series to the actual classic literary form of the story so they will comprehend the story better.

Deliberately is to think about your actions Essay

Checkpoint 1 Living deliberately is to think about your actions, and to make good choices based on the consequences of those actions. One also prioritizes the more important things in life.Living deliberately is to think about your actions, and to make good choices based on the consequences of those actions. One also prioritizes the more important things in life.Living deliberately is to think about your actions, and to make good choices based on the consequences of those actions. One also prioritizes the more important things in life.Living deliberately is to think about your actions, and to make good choices based on the consequences of those actions. One also prioritizes the more important things in life.Living deliberately is to think about your actions, and to make good choices based on the consequences of those actions. One also prioritizes the more important things in life.Living deliberately is to think about your actions, and to make good choices based on the consequences of those actions. One also prioritizes the more important things in life.Living deliberately is to think about your actions, and to make good choices based on the consequences of those actions. One also prioritizes the more important things in life. Viewpoint 1 I think the essential facts of life are to be born, to live and to die.I think the essential facts of life are to be born, to live and to die.I think the essential facts of life are to be born, to live and to die.I think the essential facts of life are to be born, to live and to die.I think the essential facts of life are to be born, to live and to die.I think the essential facts of life are to be born, to live and to die.I think the essential facts of life are to be born, to live and to die.I think the essential facts of life are to be born, to live and to die.I think the essential facts of life are to be born, to live and to die.I think the essential facts of life are to be born, to live and to die.I think the essential facts of life are to be born, to live and to die.I think the essential facts of life are to be born, to live and to die. Viewpoint 2 I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living. I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light a t the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living. I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living. I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living. I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living. I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living. I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living an good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.I think, â€Å"To live what is not life,† means you are not living a good life, you are not happy and you cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps you feel invisible or maybe you are being bullied. I think that is â€Å"to live what is not life†, because life is supposed to have good times and sad times. When you only experience the sad times, you are not truly living.

Nature Versus Nurture: Humans Should Morally Become Vegetarians Essay

To many, it is very acceptable and seemingly natural that humans include meat in their common diet. This practice can be found historically and globally across many countries and cultures. It is undeniable that humans are omnivores and have been for the past many millenniums. However, is consuming meat actually natural? What is acceptable may not be natural and may have become acceptable due to our environment and nurture, and it is important to distinguish between the two, as popular acceptance does not equal to moral rightness. In Animal Liberation, Peter Singer argues that, as animals have the ability to feel pain and pleasure, they have sentience and hence, are subject to the equal moral worth as human beings. Therefore he claims that it is only moral that most of us ought to opt for a vegetarian lifestyle. I agree with Singer on this claim based on the Natural Law Theory and with scientific proof that animals indeed have a sentience and also based on our natural physiological design. Singer argues that equality should not be limited only to humans and points out that beings with a sentience should be entitled to equal consideration of their interests (Singer, 1990), with sentience being the ability to perceive through the senses. This is perfectly reasonable as there is ethological evidence that animals do have sentience on several cases, such as sheep being able to recognize faces, prairie dogs speaking their own language. Furthermore, elephants bury their dead, gibbons take care of their elderly, and male bats babysit young bats that are not their offspring while their mothers are out hunting (Basile, 2005). These animals need not do these actions, as these actions are not necessary for their own survival, nor do their own progeny’s survival depend on them. However, these altruistic deeds show that animals do not merely act on instinct. Moreover, emotions are present in animals such as chimpanzees showing excitement and joy when they are allowed out in the sun. Also, sadly, works of Dr. Donna Haraway, a professor at the University of California, Santa Cruz, show that maternal deprivation, abuse and total isolation are shown to cause severe trauma in infant monkeys (as cited in Weisberg, 2009). The Natural Law Theory states that â€Å"good and right a direct function of the way things are naturally† and the good of human comes from realization of what is natural (VanDeVeer & Pierce, 2003). This law also supports anthropocentrism with â€Å"anthropo† being humanlike, with regards to sentience. When this theory was proposed, it was thought that only humans had the capability of being sentient and put human as of most importance. However, since some animals are now proven to have sentience, and arguably, morals as well, should they not be entitled to their own rights and interests as well? One might argue that since some animals, such as clams, cannot be proven to have emotions or morals, and hence it is morally acceptable to harvest them as food. However, this argument contains a fallacy of ignorance and is equivalent to arguing the Moon emits light before it was proven that in fact, it reflected the light from the Sun. Non-existence of an object should not be accepted simply because it has not yet been proven. Another objection to the equality of interests of animals may ensue from the natural state of the ecosystem: humans are at the top of the food chain and it is natural to consume beings positioned below us. And since the Natural Law Theory focuses on humans’ capacities, tendencies and desires, it is morally correct to consume meat as human beings. This is yet another fallacy of ignorance to what is natural. In fact, researchers have shown that humans are physiologically designed to be herbivores, and according to Dr. T. Colin Campbell, professor emeritus at Cornell University and author of The China Study, we have only started consuming meat around 10,000 years ago, which is recent in our years of evolution (as cited in Freston, 2009). Meat consumption is not essential for human survival and our omnivore tendency is out of choice, not of need. The anatomy of a human being is strikingly similar to one of a herbivore’s. Our not-so-sharp canine teeth and molar teeth are designed to optimize not the tearing of meat, but the chewing and grinding of fibrous plants. Also, carnivores have very short intestinal tracts, which is approximately three times its body length. However, a herbivore’s intestinal tract is around 12 times the body length, and human beings are extremely close to herbivores than carnivores. Also, humans lack the essential amino acids to properly digest meat and â€Å"It is clear that humankind’s gastrointestinal tract is designed for a purely plant-food diet. † (Mills, 2009). On a health perspective, meat eaters are found to be at a much higher risk of having intestinal cancer and heart disesse than those who opt for a vegetarian or even vegan diet. Towell, 2009) Since being vegetarian ultimately benefits humans and therefore flourishes humankind, fulfilling the Natural Law Theory, one can come to reason that being a vegetarian is morally correct and most should follow this lifestyle. However, it should also be pointed out that in some cases, if the human is extreme deficiency of a substance such as the vi tamin B12, and in that situation, meat contains enough of such substance that benefits the human in a much shorter time domain than choosing the vegetable alternative would, then the human should be allowed to consume meat for the sake of an utilitarianism view, as Singer supports. Since the interests of all beings count, the instant relieve of the human being leads to the longer pleasure from not being sick, and would maximize the net worth of happiness. Therefore, it is morally accepted, so long that the animal sacrificed in this case is treated as humanely as possible and with the least amount of pain inflicted upon it. Although we cannot deny that humans have more factual superiority, it does not mean we can abuse that power and forcefully consume animals against their will only to fulfill our unnatural tendencies and lust for meat. It is immoral to consume meat simply because years of nurture has made it seemingly acceptable and as a species with higher intelligence, we must take the responsibility to distinguish between nature and nurture, while ensuring the wellbeing of our moral equals and taking their interests into consideration.

Was Hitlers Rise To Power Between 1929 And Jan 1933 Inevitable Essay Example

Was Hitlers Rise To Power Between 1929 And Jan 1933 Inevitable Essay Example Was Hitlers Rise To Power Between 1929 And Jan 1933 Inevitable Paper Was Hitlers Rise To Power Between 1929 And Jan 1933 Inevitable Paper Essay Topic: History There were many reasons why Hitler was able to take power in 1933. The short term reasons were after 1929. The economic crisis and instability in Germany was a main reason why he was able to gain power. The weakness of the opposition made it easier for him to gain power also this opposition would not join and form a coalition government. After the death of Stressemann and later Hindenburg, it was much easier for Hitler to obtain political power. Germany was unstable at the time and after the formation of the Weimar republic, the constitution became weak the constitution also had a number of key flaws in it too. For instance allowing the chancellor to stop democratic voting and perspone it as long as he or she wanted and he or she could make a decision without putting it through the courts if he or she felt it was important enough. Also it included proportional representation which meant that it was near to impossible to get a larger number of seats over everyone else put together thus you had to form a coalition government which resulted in weak leadership and government. The Weimar republic was successful for some time but people always felt resentment towards the republic due to the Long-term implications of the First World War and the Treaty of Versailles. The reparations that Germany had to pay through the Treaty meant that it was in economic crisis. This helped to cause weakness in the democracy and although the Weimar Republic did have a period of recovery between 1924 and 1929 the death of Stresseman and the Wall Street Crash helped to bring it down again. The republic was weak because of all the reasons stated above. Crises in countries do happen as they did in Germany but the government has to be able to survive. If it cant survive it leaves the way open for people like Hitler to work their way to power. The German people didnt want communism, which was the other option so they turned to Nazism, as it was the only alternative to a moderate government which always lost votes in a depression or time of crisis. This is because when a country is prosperous they have no need for any extremism to change the country dramatically, and in times of crisis they need to because in general in order to get prosperity back an extreme change is needed. The middle classes feared communism because since they had established themselves from the lower or working classes, they now had a small amount of money and power in the world. They believed that economic and social chaos would move their positions about radically. They thought that the Communists would bring about this and by would drag them back down the ladder. Albert Speer, after seeing Hitler for the first time in 1931 said, Here it seemed to me was hope. The perils of Communism could be checked, Hitler persuaded us, and instead of hopeless unemployment, Germany could move towards economic recovery. The Wall Street crash had introduced mass unemployment to Germany and it had also caused poverty. Hitler promised to the people that he would do everything to make Germany recover from this unemployment and to also gain Germany prosperity and economic stability. After hyperinflation had occurred shortly after the end of the First World War the German people wanted economic stability to be able to feel safe again and the Nazi party finally offered this several years later with a legitimate claim to doing it or so the masses believed. The Weimar republic had alienated the middle classes through hyperinflation as they were not compensated after they lost everything. The government made the decision under the social democrats to print millions of bank notes, this was when Germany was in economic crisis and it was to try to try to solve the problem. However the notes became worthless and so more and more had to printed. The value of the mark on the stock exchange became almost worthless and savings that were once worth a good deal became worth hardly anything. So the middle classes voted for the Nazis, this was to get rid of the Weimar republic and democracy as it didnt seem to benefit them. Germany had a long militaristic, autocratic and authoritarian tradition. Hitler carried this on but the Weimar republic didnt, thus the people felt a strong urge to vote for the Nazis as it was more like the Germany they remembered that was prosperous. The Germans failed to develop their democracy to enable it to succeed instead they carried on their strong state led by a powerful leader. The natural even inevitable leader at this time was Hitler. He used the Brownshirts to parade in the streets and be on display; this was to show the militaristic side. Although still many people did not want a war at least it showed that Germany once again may be strong. He wore uniform when speaking to the people this showed that he was not above everyone but that he was a leader that really was going to act and not just think. He used a symbol, the swastika, to signify his party. He based his party on and used propaganda to promote the authoritarian foundations that he intended for Germany, much of this propaganda was thought up by Josef Goebbels who became a key figure in the Nazis party later. The democracy of the Weimar Republic was built upon weak foundations among the defeat of the First World War so this allows Hitler to reinforce his authoritarian ideas especially since Hitler was against democracy. Hitler was very politically skilled; he used dualism in the Reichstag to play his opponents off against each other. Despite the Nazis being revolutionary, they did eventually come to power using constitutional (they were elected they did not take power by force) methods. Hitler was not satisfied with the amount of power he was allowed because of the limitations of the constitution. He disliked the existence of other opposition parties. Thus he decided to use his political skills to eliminate the opponents that gathered in the Reichstag fire in February 1933. This provided apparent crisis for the Nazis at the time, however, it is now said that van der Lubbe, the Dutch communist really did commit the crime. The Nazis just used this coincidence to their advantage. It apparently showed that there was communist threat and the Nazi propaganda reflected this threat this ensured that the German people knew about this. This would allow Hitler to arrest the communist leaders with the support of the public. This gave the Government a legitimate reason to arrest the communists. They had to stop Germany falling into a communist anarchy and the only way to do it was to search them and their party headquarters and arrest them. The Enabling Act was thought of as a good idea to almost anybody accept by the SPD. This enabling act gave full legislative power to Hitler, the Chancellor, for four years. Before these four years ended Hitler had decided to abolish the parties and people in a position to enforce the limits on his power. A law was formed called the Law against the New formation of parties this stated that all parties except the Nazi party were illegal. Parties such as the Centre party dissolved themselves and allowed Hitler to take control, accepting the Nazi dictatorship. Germany did have an alternative was these two untiting, however as the SPD and the KPD wouldnt unite to fight the common enemy they could not help to overcome Hitler. If they had done this they could have outvoted Hitler in the Reichstag. At no time in his political career did Hitler and the Nazi party have an overall majority in the Reichstag they always had to form a coalition. The Nazis had 43. 9% of the votes in the 1933 elections this was very close to a majority. However they had been influenced as the Nazis party was literally forcing people to vote for them. They joined with the Nationalist party to gain 51. 8% of the votes, this only just allowed them to have a majority. Most of the people who were voting didnt vote for the Nazis Party in the elections despite Hitler having Chancellorship and having power he still didnt manage to gain an overall majority in the Reichstag. Only did the people accept any of this because it was in a time of such crisis. The fact that the German people were so afraid of communism (the anti-Communist hysteria) meant that Hitler could exploit this to gain his power. After passing the policy to ban the formation of new parties he managed to persuade the existing parties to disband and threw the SPD and KPD into prison as enemies of the state. The most important reason for Hitler coming to power was the First World War. This is because it supplied many other reasons in one. The First World War created ideas that were foundations of Hitlers ideas. Eventually this led to a dictatorship in Germany and another World War. The non co-operation of the opposition to unite and stop him meant that he was allowed to rise to power quite successfully and easily. The eventual collapse of the Republic left the way open for Hitler. He came forward and took power successfully. As a strong leader was needed to get Germany back on its feet this was just what they needed to start with. The militaristic traditions in Germany was a long-term reason for Hitler being able to gain power as was the Treaty of Versailles and the First World war this was because they were ultimately the start of the problems Germany was facing. Allowing Hitler to gain control and then create a dictatorship. The fear of Communism was quite Long-term but this feeling grew stronger through Hitlers propaganda and his hatred of Communists. The Weimar republic was weak to start with and under all the stress it grew weaker progressively. Hitler used this to gain power, when it failed, he picked up the pieces afterwards and rebuilt Germany. Hitlers ideas were reinforced when it failed; the people were more even more willing to turn to Nazism. They could now see how democracy had treated Germany; it did not treat anybody favourably. Germany was weak in many ways at this time and Hitler took advantage of this weakness to gain power for himself.

How to Calculate Normality of a Solution

How to Calculate Normality of a Solution The normality of a solution is the gram equivalent weight of a solute per liter of solution. It may also be called the equivalent concentration.  It is indicated using the symbol N, eq/L, or meq/L ( 0.001 N) for units of concentration. For example, the concentration of a hydrochloric acid solution might be expressed as 0.1 N HCl. A gram equivalent weight or equivalent is a measure of the reactive capacity of a given chemical species (ion, molecule, etc.). The equivalent value is determined using the molecular weight and valence of the chemical species. Normality is the only concentration unit that is reaction dependent. Here are examples of how to calculate the normality of a solution. Key Takeaways Normality is a unit of concentration of a chemical solution expressed as gram equivalent weight of solute per liter of solution. A defined equivalence factor must be used to express concentration.Common units of normality include N, eq/L, or meq/L.Normality is the only unit of chemical concentration that depends on the chemical reaction being studied.Normality is not the most common unit of concentration, nor is its use appropriate for all chemical solutions. Typical situations when you might use normality include acid-base chemistry, redox reactions, or precipitation reactions. For most other situations, molarity or molality are better options for units. Normality Example #1 The easiest way to find normality is from molarity. All you need to know are how many mole of ions dissociate. For example, a 1 M sulfuric acid (H2SO4) is 2 N for acid-base reactions because each mole of sulfuric acid provides 2 moles of H ions. 1 M sulfuric acid is 1 N for sulfate precipitation since 1 mole of sulfuric acid provides 1 mole of sulfate ions. Normality Example #2 36.5 grams of hydrochloric acid (HCl) is a 1 N (one normal) solution of HCl. A normal is one gram equivalent of a solute per liter of solution. Since hydrochloric acid is a strong acid that dissociates completely in water, a 1 N solution of HCl would also be 1 N for H or Cl- ions for acid-base reactions. Normality Example #3 Find the normality of 0.321 g sodium carbonate in a 250 mL solution. To solve this problem, you need to know the formula for sodium carbonate. Once you realize there are two sodium ions per carbonate ion, the problem is simple: N 0.321 g Na2CO3  x (1 mol/105.99 g) x (2 eq/1 mol)N 0.1886 eq/0.2500 LN 0.0755 N Normality Example #4 Find the percent acid (eq wt 173.8) if 20.07 mL of 0.1100 N base is required to neutralize 0.721 g of a sample. This is essentially a matter of being able to cancel out units to obtain the final result. Remember, if given a value in milliliters (mL), its necessary to convert it to liters (L). The only tricky concept is realizing the acid and base equivalence factors will be in a 1:1 ratio. 20.07 mL x (1 L/1000 mL) x (0.1100 eq base/1 L) x (1 eq acid/1 eq base) x (173.8 g/1 eq) 0.3837 g acid When to Use Normality There are specific circumstances when its preferable to use normality rather than molarity or other unit of concentration of a chemical solution. Normality is used in acid-base chemistry to describe the concentration of hydronium (H3O) and hydroxide (OH-). In this situation, 1/feq is an integer.The equivalence factor or normality is used in precipitation reactions to indicate the number of ions that will precipitate. Here, 1/feq is once again and integer value.In redox reactions, the equivalence factor indicates how many electrons can be donated or accepted by an oxidizing or reducing agent. For redox reactions, 1/feq may be a fraction. Considerations Using Normality Normality is not an appropriate unit of concentration in all situations. First, it requires a defined equivalence factor. Second, the normality is not a set value for a chemical solution. Its value can change according to the chemical reaction being examined. For example, a solution of CaCl2 that is 2 N with respect to the chloride (Cl-) ion would only be 1 N with respect to the magnesium (Mg2) ion. Reference The use of the equivalence concept. IUPAC (archived).

Speech to an existing presentation etc. - Control System Design Term Paper

Speech to an existing presentation etc. - Control System Design Knowledge requested - Term Paper Example It also helps the planes to stick to their routes during a flight process. I have observed this as a very helpful project that can reduce many problems in the transport sector, most importantly air transport. I would like to get your support in this project. At this juncture, let me introduce the project and give you its status together with the problems that I have experienced in carrying out the project. In the due course of my presentation, I will also show you the solutions that I took to solve the problems that I came across. Finally, I will give you the opportunity to listen to decisions that I took as remedies to the experiences, which I had. The system comprises of three parts; flight monitoring unit, which is our own unit, safety unit together with radar and defense system. The systems work hand in hand with each other smoothly to reduce any risks that can arise at any stage of the flight process. The flight-monitoring unit is divided into four partners but since we are the system OEM we are responsible for the completely functioning processes of the unit. The partners that we indentified to help us manage the system are Laissez Fair with twelve percent, Bankarottair who is holding nineteen percent and Rashid Air System has a share of twenty-three percent. We are yet to identify any partner who will be in charge of parachute control. Project process At this point comrades, let me make it more realistic and simple for you to understand the process through the diagrams. At the start, we start with designing the code. After designing the code, we deliver it to Rashid air who accepts the software test. Bankarottair does software integration after Rashid air has completed the software acceptance testing. The software comes back to us to test the integration and then, take to Laissez fair to find if the software has any problem. If there is any problem, then they fix it before moving to the final stage of verification and start releasing with the authorities . Project Plan and Status The period set to complete this program is short. The deadline is 30th January next year. Looking at the schedule, there is a lot of work that need to be done in this very short period. As you can see, we completed the first step at a hundred percent and took to Rashid air to do the software accepting some few weeks ago. They had completed up to eighty percent when we received their message that the system is experiencing some failure. Therefore, the other processes have not yet started. Basing on this it is most determinable that if remedies are not put in place at the correct time, we shall be late for a long period. The remaining processes are important and they may require enough time to deal with them. There are five general processes so far we have managed to complete only one. The second one is almost to the end although it has some challenges that require special attention. Problems Our colleagues from India report that they are experiencing great p roblems. They say that it will be necessary to shut down the system then restart it after sometime. This will cause a delay of several days that we did not expect. According to their report, it may take five or eight days to fix the problem. This will attract a penalty of $50,000. This means that for eight days, we will have to pay about four hundred thousand US dollars. The reason is that we have to replace a rig module. This could take around five days to replace then

An external consultant to a company and you need to prepare a report Essay

An external consultant to a company and you need to prepare a report on their performance based on the information they provided - Essay Example However these figures do not show how efficiently the company is earning these profits. How much risk each company is taking to earn these returns is not known. The future prospects of the company with respect to its performance can also not be predicted by just looking at absolute numbers. It is important to analyze each figure in relation to the others to be able to conclude about a company’s performance. Hence, though company A is earning more than B, we need to look at the sales figures on which these profits are earned. Hence, if company B is earning this on a sale of $10,000 million while company A is earning it on sale of $20,000, company A is actually earning only 2.5% on its total sales while B is earning 3.5%. Hence, B is actually earning better. Similarly, if company B has very high debt with respect to its equity, then this company is highly leveraged and much riskier than A, though the absolute debt figures of company A might look bigger than B. Thus, ratio analys is which helps to establish relationship of one financial figure with the other helps in analyzing different companies in better light. Another advantage of ratio analysis is that it helps in comparing completely different balance sheets. For example, company A might publish its results in British pounds while B might do the same in Dollars. Ratios help in directly comparing the two companies irrespective of the currency they use in their financial statements. Ratio analysis also helps in analyzing a company’s performance by looking at its various business aspects i.e. profitability, liquidity, leverage, operational efficiency (turnover ratios) as well as market valuations. Various aspects of analysis We will conduct a time series analysis (for the various ratios) for Wm Morrison Supermarkets for a period from 2008 to 2010. We will also compare it with Tesco which operates in the same industrial sector. Other than the ratio analysis we will also compare some other aspects of their business like their market penetration, and their product line etc. Choosing the right ratios The various ratios we will be using will be based on following categories Profitability ratios – (Gross Profit, Net profit and Operating ratios) These ratios help in analyzing the efficiency with which the company has used its resources to generate profits. Gross profit sees the amount of profit earned after taking out the cost of sales which includes administrative and sales expenses. Net profit looks at overall earnings after taking into account all expenses including interest and tax expenses. Operating ratio takes into account operating expenses viz-a-viz sales. Liquidity ratios – (Current ratio, Quick ratio) These ratios show how easily a company can liquidate its short term assets to honor its short term liabilities especially the suppliers and financers. Turnover/activity ratios – (Fixed assets, Current assets and inventory turnover ratios and day’s receivable holding) These ratios help in analyzing how efficiently a company converts its assets into revenues. They also tell how effectively the company has used is resources to generate sales (revenues) (Loth 2011). Leverage – (Debt-Equity) These ratios tell about the amount of risk a company has taken and eventually its share holders are facing. Valuation ratios - ROI (Return on Investment) These ratios hel